|
Machrybopsis australis
prairie chub
THIS ACCOUNT IS IN PROCESS. PLEASE CHECK BACK LATER FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.
Type Locality
Red River, 6 to 9 miles
southwest of Hollis, Harmon County, Oklahoma (Hubbs and Ortenburger 1929).
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Macr – Greek, meaning
“long”, referring to elongated forms of Hybopsis (Scharpf 2005);
australis – Latin, meaning “southern”, probably referring to the more
southerly range of this species to its putative sister species,
Macrhybopsis tetranema, the peppered chub; the common name, prairie
chub, refers to the prairies drained by streams in the range of M.
australis (Eisenhour 2004).
Synonymy
Eisenhour (1999) recognized
Macrhybopsis australis as distinct species within the M.
aestivalis complex. See Eisenhour (1997) for
complete synonymy.
Extrarius australis
Hubbs and Ortenburger 1929:26-28.
Hybopsis aestivalis
australis Davis and Miller (1967); Miller and Robison 1973:63-64;
Douglas 1974:100.
Macrhybopsis australis
Eisenhour (1999); Underwood et al. (2003); Eisenhour (2004); Hubbs et al.
2008:21.
Characters
Maximum size: 70 mm TL
(female); 65 mm TL (male; Eisenhour 2004).
Coloration: Pallid and
translucent, in life, often with a pink wash throughout, pale yellow or gray
dorsally, silvery white ventrally, with broad silver lateral stripe; small
melanophores scattered over dorsolateral surface of body, not concentrated
on margin or submargin of scales; poorly defined lateral stripe present to
nearly absent, composed of small, often X-shaped melanophores, centered one
scale row above lateral line; dorsal fin with fairly dark pigment on basal
third of first 3-5 rays; pigment on distal portion of rays lacking or
reduced. Pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins generally lacking pigment; rarely
some pigment on pectoral rays (Eisenhour 2004).
Counts: Pharyngeal
teeth 0,4-4,0; 19 (16-20) principal caudal rays; 7 (6-8) anal rays; 7-8
(6-9) pelvic rays; 13-15 (12-17) pectoral rays; 36-42 (34-44) lateral-line
scales; 2-16 (0-19) predorsal scales; 5-6 (4-7) scales above lateral line;
4-5 (4-6) scales below lateral line; 12-16 (12-17) caudal peduncle scales;
12-16 (10-16) infraorbital pores; 10-12 (9-14) preoperculomandibular pores;
35-36 (34-36) total vertebrae; 16-18 (16-19 precaudal vertebrae; 17-19
caudal vertebrae (Eisenhour 2004).
Mouth position:
Inferior and horizontal; width equal to head width when viewed ventrally;
lips very fleshy and thickened posteriorly (Eisenhour 2004).
Body shape: Fusiform
with moderately slender caudal peduncle; head conical and flattened
ventrally with long and relatively pointed snout (Eisenhour 2004).
External morphology:
Nape fully scaled or with scattered embedded scales, rarely naked; belly
posterior to pelvic fin bases naked to fully scaled (≤66% of area covered
with exposed scales in 79% of specimens examined); belly just anterior to
pelvic fin bases naked (in 85% of individuals examined) or with few scales
not forming a bridge across belly. Anal and dorsal fins slightly falcate;
pelvic fins pointed; pectoral fins long and falcate, reaching past bases of
pelvic fins in adult males and just reaching bases of pelvic fins in adult
females; eyes tiny and round (or nearly so); 2 prominent pairs of maxillary
barbels present, the more posterior pair > than orbit length and the
anterior pair > 50% of orbit length; cutaneous taste buds expanded into
large papillae on gular area; in both sexes, genital papillae poorly
developedas small conical or cylindrical extensions; gill rakers on first
arch absent or present as 1-3 dorsal rudiments (Eisenhour 2004). In large
nuptial males, pectoral rays 2-10 are greatly thickened with rows of small,
conical, antrorse, recurved biserial tubercles; basal part of rays and
primary branches each with 1-2 rows of tubercles; 2 tubercles per fin ray
segment on posterior primary branch, 1-2 tubercles per segment on the
anterior primary branch; tubercles arranged uniserially on secondary
branches (Eisenhour 2004).
Distribution (Native and Introduced)
U.S. distribution:
Endemic to the upper Red River basin (Eisenhour 2004; Hubbs et al. 2008).
Texas distribution:
Upper Red River basin (Eisenhour 2004; Hubbs et al. 2008).
Abundance/Conservation status (Federal, State, NGO)
Special Concern status in
Texas (Hubbs et al. 2008).
Habitat Associations
Macrohabitat: Medium
to large streams (Eisenhour 2004).
Mesohabitat: Found in
flowing water over coarse sand and fine gravel substrates in
streams; occupies intermittent streams that may dry to isolated,
salt-encrusted pools (Winston et al. 1991; Eisenhour 2004). Distribution in
correlated with high levels of dissolved salts (Taylor et al. 1993;
Eisenhour 2004; Higgins and Wilde 2005); reported from waters with
salinities up to 19.6‰ (Echelle et al. 1972; Eisenhour 2004).
Biology
Spawning season:
Spawning habitat:
Spawning Behavior:
Fecundity:
Age at maturation:
Migration:
Growth and Population
structure:
Longevity:
Food habits: Primarily
taste-feeders – “mouth tasters” (Davis and Miller 1967); observed (in
captivity) swimming over the bottom with pectoral fins spread widely and
barbels in contact with the sand substrate until cutaneous taste buds on the
barbels, fins and body apparently detected the food (Daphnia sp. and
“dry food”).
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes
Macrhybopsis australis
distinguished from all other members of the M. aestivalis complex (M.
aestivalis, M. hyostoma, M. marconis, M. tetranema)
by the combination of two pairs of well-developed barbels, the posterior
pair > orbit length and the anterior pair> 50% of orbit length, and modally
7 anal rays (Eisenhour 2004). M. australis and the peppered chub (M.
tetranema), a species endemic to the upper Arkansas River basin, are
sister species (Underwood et al. 2003; Eisenhour 2004); M. marconis
is sympatric with the shoal chub (M. hyostoma) in the middle Red
River mainstem.
Host Records
Commercial or Environmental Importance
References
Davis, B.J.,
and R.J. Miller. 1967. Brain patterns in minnows of the genus Hybopsis
in relation to feeding habits. Copeia 1967(1):1-39.
Douglas, N.H.
1974. Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana. Claitor’s Publishing Division, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana. 443.
Echelle, A.A.,
A.F. Echelle, and C.G. Hill. 1972. Interspecific interactions and limiting
factors of abundance and distribution in the Red River pupfish,
Cyprinodon rubrofluviatilis. American Midland Naturalist 88:109-130.
Eisenhour, D.J.
1997. Systematics, variation and speciation of the Macrhybopsis
aestivalis complex (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) west of the Mississippi
River. Unpubl. PhD Dissertation. Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale. 260
pp.
Eisenhour,
D. 1999. Systematics of Macrhypbopsis tetranema (Cypriniformes:
Cyprinidae). Copeia 1999: 969-980.
Eisenhour, D. J. 2004. Systematics, variation, and speciation of the
Macrhybopsis aestivalis complex west of the Mississippi River. Bulletin
Alabama Museum of Natural History 23:9-48.
Higgins, C.L., and G.R. Wilde. 2005. The role of salinity in structuring
fish assemblages in a prairie stream system. Hydrobiologia 549:197-203.
Hubbs, C.,
R.J. Edwards, and G.P. Garrett. 2008. An annotated checklist of the
freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species. Texas
Journal of Science, Supplement, 2nd edition 43(4):1-87.
Hubbs, C.L.,
and A.I. Ortenburger. 1929. Further notes on the fishes of Oklahoma, with
descriptions of new species of Cyprinidae. Publ. Univ. Okla. Biol. Surv.
1(2):17-43.
Miller, R.J., and H.W. Robison. 1973. The Fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State
University Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma. 246 pp.
Scharpf, C. 2005. Annotated checklist of North American freshwater fishes,
including subspecies and undescribed forms, Part 1: Petromyzontidae through
Cyprinidae. American Currents, Special Publication 31(4):1-44.
Taylor, C.M., M.R. Winston, and W.J. Matthews. 1993. Fish
species-environment and abundance relationships in a Great Plains river
system. Ecography 16(1):16-23.
Underwood, D.M., A.A. Echelle, D.J. Eisenhour, M.D. Jones, A.F. Echelle, and
W.L. Fisher. 2003. Genetic
variation in western members of the
Macrhybopsis aestivalis
complex (Teleostei:
Cyprinidae), with emphasis on those of the Red and Arkansas River basins.
Copeia 2003(3):493-501.
Winston, M.R., C.M. Taylor, and J. Pigg. 1991. Upstream extirpation of four
minnow species due to damming of a prairie stream. Transactions of the
American Fisheries Society 120:98-105.
|