|
Ichthyomyzon gagei
southern brook lamprey
Type Locality
Stream 0.8 km s of Dry Prong,
Grant Par., LA (Hubbs and Trautman 1937)
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Ichthyomyzon, Greek,
“fish sucker”; gagei, named for S.H. Gage, one of the foremost
students of Lampreys (Pflieger 1997).
Synonymy
Ichthymyzon gagei
Hubbs and Trautman 1937:80; Cook 1959:45.
Characters
Maximum size: 166 mm
TL (Knapp 1951).
Coloration: It is gray
to brown dorsally, becoming lighter tan or cream colored along the sides.
The tail and head are generally darker than midbody regions. Lateral line
organs are usually (but not always) conspicuous as dark spots or as lighter
rings surrounded by a darker rim (Ross 2001).
Counts: Trunk myomeres
50-52 (49-50), supraoral cusps 3 (2-5), and infraoral cusps number 5-12
(Ross 2001).
Body shape: Intestine
not developed (Hubbs et al. 1991).
Mouth position:
Subterminal (Goldstein and Simon 1999). Teeth degenerate (Dendy and Scott
1953).
External morphology:
Disc small; length of disc contained 17.2 to 26.3 times in total length;
cusps in posterior field degenerate (Hubbs et al. 1991); eye well-developed
in adults (Ross 2001).
Distribution (Native and Introduced)
U.S. distribution:
Ranges along Gulf of Mexico drainages from western Florida to eastern Texas,
north through eastern Oklahoma to Missouri, and east to Tennessee (Hubbs et
al. 1991). Disjunct population reported to inhabit the upper Mississippi
River in Wisconsin and Minnesota (Cochran 1987).
Texas distribution:
This non-parasitic species occurs in Red, Sabine, San Jacinto, and Neches
basins (Hubbs et al. 1991); Warren et al. (2000) lists the following
drainage units for this species in TX: Red River unit, Sabine Lake unit, and
the Galveston Bay unit. Bailey (1947) reported collection of an adult
specimen of I. gagei from a creek in Nacogdoches County (Neches River
System) and provided measurements of the specimen, the first apparent record
of a lamprey from the state. Toole (1950) reported another collection of
I. gagei from Nacogdoches County, Texas, by Clark Hubbs. Knapp (1951)
reported a female specimen of I. gagei taken by Richard B. Davis in a
small stream, in Tyler County, Texas and provided measurements.
Dendy and Scott (1953) noted
the following specimens collected in Texas waters:
Neches River System
UMMZ No. 143081 (1
adult)-Texas, Nacogdoches Co.: Addison Lee; March, 1936 (Dendy and Scott
1953).
Trinity River System
UT No. 1435 (1 female)-Texas,
Polk. Co.: tributary of Long King Creek 2 mi. n of Goodrich on U.S. Highway
59; Clark Hubbs; March 23, 1951.
UT No. 1593 (1male and 1
female) -Texas, Polk Co.: 3mi. e of Livingston; Clark Hubbs; March 23, 1951
(Dendy and Scott 1953).
San Jacinto River System
UT No. 1184 (1 male) -Texas,
Montgomery Co.: Covey Creek; 8mi e of Conroe; Clark Hubbs; March 23,
1951(Dendy and Scott 1953).
Abundance/Conservation status (Federal, State, NGO)
Populations in the southern
United States are currently secure (Warren et al. 2000).
Habitat Associations
Macrohabitat: Streams
(Rhode and Lanteigne-Courchene 1980; Moshin and Gallaway 1977).
Mesohabitat:
Restricted to freshwater (Hardisty and Potter 1971). Adults occur in fairly
swift water (30-50 cm/s) over a coarse-sand substrate, although adults may
also occur in the slow current area more typical of ammocoetes (Beamish
1982; Beamish and Thomas 1984). Ammocoetes found in sand bottom of small
streams and occasionally in substrata in higher amounts of silt and decaying
leaves such as accumulates below sand bars (Dendy and Scott 1953; Carlander
1969).
Biology
Spawning season: In
Mill Creek drainage, Texas, most of reproduction occurred in the spring;
however sampling data suggests that some spawning may occur over a longer
period (Moshin and Gallaway 1977). March to May (Rohde and
Lanteigne-Courchene 1980); at water temperatures between 15-24 degrees C
(Dendy and Scott 1953). In Choclafaula Creek, Alabama, adults spawned
between mid-April and early May (William and Beamish 1982).
Spawning habitat:
Gravel or sand; Dendy and Scott (1953) found 3-4 nests on the upstream end
of a riffle where the bottom material was gravel and sand, in water 2-3
inches deep; largest pebbles were about 2 inches in diameter; nests
consisted of round depressions 6 to 8 inches wide and approximately 2 inches
deep.
Reproductive strategy:
Dendy and Scott (1953) observed spawning on Choclafaula Creek (Alabama River
System): the number of lampreys participating in nest building and spawning
activities ranged from 5 to 20 or more per nest. They attached themselves to
pebbles with their sucking discs and swam rapidly in an upstream or lateral
direction removing the pebbles from the nest. On one occasion two
individuals attached themselves to one stone which was too large for a
single lamprey to move and thus succeeded in removing it. This behavior may
have been accidental cooperation. Some lampreys moved about from one nest to
another, thus, giving the nesting an appearance of a community project.
Dendy and Scott (1953) observed and described reproductive behavior in
aquarium conditions.
Fecundity: In an
Alabama population, number of oocytes ranged from 820-2,485 between 95-150
mm TL; maximum gonadosomic ratio in males was 17.1% and 26.3% in females
(William and Beamish 1982). Egg counts prior to spawning for 10 females
ranged from 1,000 to 3,264 with an average of 1,787 (Dendy and Scott 1953).
Hatching occurs 2-3 weeks after spawning (Beamish 1993). Beamish et al.
(1994) study indicated fecundity subject to environmental influence,
particularly larval growth and pH.
Age at maturation:
Ammocoetes require at least 3 years to complete development (Rhode and
Lanteigne-Courchene 1980. Ammocoetes as small as 80 mm TL may have
well-developed gonads (Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Migration: During
transformation, young lampreys migrate to clear, moderately flowing waters
over sand and relatively clean gravel where transformation is completed
(Dendy and Scott 1953; Boschung and Mayden 2004).
Longevity: Adults die
within 2-26 days after spawning (Dendy and Scott 1953).
Growth and Population
Structure: Recently hatched ammocoetes 11-14 mm TL (Moshin and
Gallaway 1977). Ammocoetes require at least three years to complete
development (Rohde and Lanteigne-Courchene 1980). In an Alabama study,
length-frequency curves for larvae indicated a larval life of 3 ¼- 4 ¼
years. Growth rate was constant throughout the year for each age group. Sex
ration of larval I. gagei (male to female) was 1:1.02. Metamorphosis
initiated in early September, completed between early February and mid-March
(William and Beamish 1982). Boschung and Mayden (2004) report collection of
adults as small as 82 mm TL. Beamish and Thomas (1984) reported large
ammocoetes beginning to metamorphosis to adult stage in late August or early
September, duration of metamorphosis approximately 6 months; minimum sizes
at metamorphosis at least 100 mm for males and 105 mm for females. Females
tend to be longer then males, with females averaging 117-127 mm TL compared
to 106-116 mm TL for males (Dendy and Scott 1953; Moshin and Gallaway 1977;
Beamish 1982). In Mill Creek drainage, Texas, ammocoetes were abundant
during all seasons, while adults were relatively abundant only during winter
and spring periods (Moshin and Gallaway 1977). Sexes of ammocoetes not
distinct until after about 50-90 mm, when the larvae are 12-17 months of age
(Ross 2001); rapid development of eggs in almost all larvae of this size
range, but eggs developing in “males” were then reabsorbed; occurrence of
oocytes in testes of large male not uncommon (Beamish and Thomas 1983).
Environmental factors including average growth rate of individuals in a
population, larval density, pH, average stream temperature largely control
sex determination (Beamish 1993).
Food habits:
Herbivore/detritivore; filter feeder; filterer (trophic mode; Goldstein and
Simon 1999). Ammocoetes feed on minute organic particles for several years
prior to metamorphosing into adults (Carlander 1969). I. gagei does
not feed following the larval interval; species relies on stored energy to
sustain their metabolic requirements, including gonadal maturation, through
to the completion of spawning after which they die (Beamish and Legrow
1983). Main food items include plankton, particularly diatoms and organic
detritus; (Moshin and Gallaway 1977). In Mill Creek drainage, Texas,
condition of ammocoetes markedly increased from winter to spring, this
coinciding with an increase in the amount of food ingested, the organic
content of the material, and with presumed changes associated with
transformation (Moshin and Gallaway 1977).
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes
Non-parasitic Ichthyomyzon
gagei thought to be derived from the parasitic I. castaneus
(chestnut lamprey) to which it is most similar, and from which it differs as
an adult by the oral disk being narrower (rather than wider) than head with
width and by the degenerate digestive tract. The ammocoetes are very
difficult to separate, but I. gagei tends to have less pigmentation
below the eye and in front of the gill region and usually has well pigmented
lateral line organs. Because of rapid sexual development at the end of the
larval period, late stage ammocoetes (greater than 100mm) often have well
developed gonads. The presence of developed gonads in the ammocoetes stage
is the best means of distinguishing I. gagei from the I. castaneus
(Ross 2001).
Host Records
Commercial or Environmental
Importance
[Additional literature
noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not
limited to the following: Hubbs (1957); Big Sandy Creek (Evans and Noble
1979).]
References
Bailey, R.M. 1947. Records of the lamprey (Ichthyomyzon gagei) in
Oklahoma and Texas. Copeia 1947(2):146.
Beamish, F.W.H. 1982. Biology of the southern brook lamprey, Ichthyomyzon
gagei. Env. Bio. Fish. 7(4): 305-320.
Beamish, F.W.H. 1983. Potential and actual fecundity of the “paired”
lampreys, Ichthyomyzon gagei and I. castaneus. Copeia
1983(2):367-374.
Beamish, F.W.H. 1993. Environmental sex determination in southern brook
lamprey, Ichthyomyzon gagei. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:1299-1307.
Beamish, F.W.H., and M. Legrow. 1983. Bioenergetics of the southern brook
lamprey, Ichthyomyzon gagei. Journal of Animal Ecology 52:575-590.
Beamish, F.W.H. and E.J. Thomas. 1984. Metamorphosis of the southern brook
lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus. Copeia 1984(2): 502-515.
Beamish, F.W.H., P.K. Ott, S.L. Roe. 1994. Interpopulational variation in
fecundity and egg size in southern brook lamprey, Ichthyomyzon gagei.
Copeia 1994(3):718-725.
Boschung, H.T., Jr., and R.L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian
Books, Washington. 736 pp.
Carlander, K.D. 1969. Handbook of Freshwater fishery biology. Vol.1. The
Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
Cochran, P.A. 1987. The southern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon gagei)
in the St. Croix River drainage of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Copeia
1987(2):443-446.
Cook, F.A. 1959. Freshwater fishes in Mississippi. Mississippi Game and Fish
Commission, Jackson.
Dendy, J. S. and D.C. Scott. 1953. Distribution, Life History, and
Morphological Variations of the Southern Brook Lamprey, Ichthyomyzon
gagei. Copeia 1953(3):152-162.
Evans, J.W., and R.L. Noble. 1979. The longitudinal distribution of fishes
in an east Texas stream. American Midland Naturalist 101(2):333-343.
Goldstein, R.M., and T.P. Simon. 1999. Toward a united definition of guild
structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. pp.
123-202 in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and
biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Florida.
Hardisty, W.M. and I.C. Potter. 1971. The behavior, ecology and growth of
larval lampreys, pp 85-125. In biology of lampreys. Vol. 1. M. W. Hardisty
and I.C. Potter, eds. Academic Press, New York, NY.
Hubbs, C. 1957. Distributional patterns of Texas fresh-water fishes. The
Southwestern Naturalist 2(2/3):89-104.
Hubbs, C.L. and M. B. Trautman. 1937. A revision of the lamprey genus
Ichthyomyzon. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 35:1-109.
Hubbs, Carl L., R.J. Edwards and G.P. Garret. 1991. An annotated checklist
of freshwater fishes of Texas, with key to identification of species. Texas
Journal of Science, Supplement 43(4):1-56.
Knapp, F. T. 1951. Additional Reports of Lampreys from Texas. Copeia
1951(1):87.
Moshin, A.K.M., and B.J. Gallaway. 1977. Seasonal abundance, distribution,
food habitats and condition of the southern brook lamprey, Ichthyomyzon
gagei Hubbs and Trautman, in an east Texas watershed. The Southwestern
Naturalist 22(1):107-114.
Pflieger, W.L. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri. Revised Edition. Missouri
Department of Conservation. Jefferson City. 372 pp.
Rohde, F.C. and J. Lanteigne-Courchene 1980. Ichthyomyzon gagei (Hubbs
and Trautman), Southern Brook Lamprey.pp.18 in D.S. Lee et al. Atlas
of North American Freshwater Fishes. N.C. State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh,
i-r+854 pp.
Ross, Stephen T. 2001. The Inland Fishes of Mississippi. University Press of
Mississippi, Jackson. 624 pp.
Toole, M.1950. Texas Game Fish. 8(4):15
Warren, L. W., Jr., B. M. Burr, S. J. Walsh, H. L. Bart, Jr., R. C. Cashner,
D. A. Etnier, B. J. Freeman, B. R. Kuhajda, R. L. Mayden, H. W. Robison, S.
T. Ross, and W. C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation
status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States.
Fisheries 25(10):7-29.
William, F., and H. Beamish. 1982. Biology of the southern brook lamprey,
Ichthyomyzon gagei. Environmental Biology of Fishes 7(4):302-320.
|